Mark from Dublin, 15 Dec 2008
Lets set things straight sequels very rarely shine so they have to work that much harder to be a success. Stone does just about enough in this but she does come across as not as strong a character than in the first movie, still she looks good. What really let this down was the supporting cast the main man had no spark about him at all, with stone and douglas there was that chemistry this guy never got his bunsen burner lit and dont even get me started on the copper, woeful.
Basic Instinct 2
Robert from Dublin, 10 May 2007
I've read bad reviews about this movie, but I think it's not a bad movie at all. Some of the erotic scenes were shocking, but the film had similar tension about it as Basic Instint 1 with unexpected twists. Worth seeing.
one of the worst movie ever
amandine from Dublin, 29 May 2008
apart from sharon stone's body there's nothing to see, the story is the same as the first one, the acting is dreadful... a waste of time!
Pamela from Dublin, 31 Jul 2007
I thought for a sequal that took so long to make that it would be crap! But it was an enjoyable film much like the first
crap crap crap
jenni from Westmeath, 02 Aug 2007
What a waste of time, this film is ridiculous. It is the worst movie I have ever seen.